Airplanes and Rockets' history & copyright Google search American Modeler Air Trails American Aircraft Modeler Young Men Hobbies Aviation Flying Aces Saturday Evening Post Boys' Life Hobby Distributors Amateur Astronomy Engines & Motors Balsa Densities Silkspan Covering Comics Electronics My Models Model Aircraft Articles Plans Model Boat Articles Plans Model Car Articles Plans Model Train Articles Plans 1941 Crosley 03CB Radio Model helicopter articles & plans Crosswords Model Rocket Articles Plans Restoration Projects Photos Peanuts Collection Model Aircraft Articles Plans Sitemap Homepage Hints and Kinks Amateur Radio Archives of the homepage R/C Modeler Electronics About Airpleans and Rockest, Disclaimer, Terms of Use Model Topics Please Donate to Airplanes and Rockets Parole Plaza, Annapolis, Maryland Hobby Items for Sale Airplanes and Rockets Hero Graphic

Rocket Kits + Accessories - Airplanes and Rockets

Plastic Scale Model Kits - Airplanes and Rockets

Professor Phugoid and His Contribution to Modeling
April 1951 Air Trails

April 1951 Air Trails
April 1951 Air Trails Cover - Airplanes and Rockets Table of Contents

These pages from vintage modeling magazines like Flying Aces, Air Trails, American Modeler, American Aircraft Modeler, Young Men, Flying Models, Model Airplane News, R/C Modeler, captured the era. All copyrights acknowledged.

An ability to trim a model aircraft for proper flight with no supplementary control surface input has, since the advent of precise, reliable radio control (R/C), been the domain mostly of the relatively small number of free flight (F/F) and competition fliers of control line (C/L) and R/C. Most models can be made to fly very well when a human or electronic pilot is able to make corrective deflections of control surfaces. Warped and twisted wings, misaligned tail surfaces, and even a dangerously mislocated center of gravity can have their otherwise detrimental - even dangerous - effects mitigated by a skillful flyer. Authors have written that a properly trimmed model of any sort will fly more precisely and successfully. This article from a 1951 issue of Air Trails magazine offers very useful instruction on how to configure a model airplane for both a proper power-off glide and a power-on climb.

I have been guilty of applying the wrong technique when attempting to countering the severely nose-high attitude that sailplanes with a flat-bottomed airfoil wing exhibit when a motor and propeller are mounted in the nose. A large amount of down thrust is required to counter the tendency to climb at a very high angle. With electronic mixing, down elevator can be progressively coupled to an increase in throttle. Moving the center of gravity rearward (but not too far) does reduce - but not eliminate - the effect. I learned something useful here. BTW, I have also noticed that mounting a power pod above the wing, near the center of gravity and the center of lift, does not require any down thrust to achieve a good climb attitude under power. You can see the many configurations I have tried with my Great Planes 2-Meter Spirit glider.

Wikipedia states: "The phugoid has a nearly constant angle of attack but varying pitch, caused by a repeated exchange of airspeed and altitude. It can be excited by an elevator singlet (a short, sharp deflection followed by a return to the centered position) resulting in a pitch increase with no change in trim from the cruise condition. As speed decays, the nose drops below the horizon. Speed increases, and the nose climbs above the horizon. Microlight aircraft typically show a phugoid period of 15–25 seconds."

Free Flight Model Trimming

Professor Phugoid and His Contribution to Modeling, from April 1951 Air Trails - Airplanes and RocketsYou may have read many articles on adjustment, but we say this is the most important ever to be presented ... peruse and profit!

By William F. McCombs

Many well-built and well-proportioned models are unable to give the best performance of which they are capable simply because they have never been correctly adjusted or trimmed for flight. In fact, as is well known, a very large number of models are destroyed or severely crippled in the initial test flying stages.

It is the purpose of this. article to give the reader, whether his experience be extensive or limited, an understanding of how a completed model can best be adjusted for flight. It is also intended to point out how to observe from the flights what features of the design should be corrected or changed.

Before making test flights on any free-flight model, rubber or gas, the thrust line or axis of propeller rotation should be tilted down two or three degrees, as in Figure 1. This is called adding downthrust.

Longitudinal trimming is done to correct any stalling or diving tendencies which may be present and to secure the best duration of flight. It is important to understand that in all cases the model must be trimmed in such a way as to take care of two flight conditions: (a) flight without power, that is, in the glide, and (b) flight with power applied, that is, with the propeller turning and driving the model.

In all free-flight designs, rubber or gas, the leading edge of the wing should be tilted up so that there's an angle of four or five degrees between the wing chord line and the centerline of the fuselage as shown in Figure 1. This angle is called the angle of incidence from the fuselage, and the amount mentioned will result in the fuselage having the smallest drag or resistance to the airstream in flight. This is because the angle of attack of most airfoils used in models is around four or five degrees for best duration (minimum sinking speed).

Consider the case of a typical rubber contest model of the tractor type (propeller in the front). First, the wing is strapped onto the fuselage at what is believed to be the correct position. As a first guess, this may be at a point where the model will balance midway between the leading and trailing edges of the wing. Enough incidence is then added to give the four or five degree angle mentioned above.

The model is then glided gently into tall grass and the flight path is noted. If the tendency is to dive in, the trailing edge of the stabilizer is blocked up slightly. This is called putting negative incidence into the stabilizer. If the tendency is to stall, the leading edge of the stabilizer is blocked up slightly. This is called putting positive incidence into the stabilizer.

Note that the position of the wing is not changed to correct for diving or stalling tendencies as is so often recommended. Several more hand glides are then made and the stabilizer setting corrected in the above manner until a smooth steady glide is obtained. This only represents a first guess for correct gliding trim since the model must glide in smoothly from 30 or 40 feet of altitude before we can be fairly certain the trim is correct.

The next step is to put 40 or 50 hand winds into the motor, launch the model from the hand, and observe the flight path. Suppose that it climbs up a little, then begins to stall under power or hang on the prop, but finally manages to recover and glide in smoothly when the power gives out. This means that the gliding trim is pretty nearly correct but that the "power on" trim is not. The most commonly used method of correcting such a condition is to add excessive downthrust, eight or ten degrees or more, until no stalling under power shows up as in Figure 2.

This is not at all the most efficient manner of adjusting. When a model is trimmed for good glide but noses up under power with two or three degrees of downthrust, the real trouble is that the model is too stable. It is an established fact that both large-scale aircraft and models which are quite stable tend to nose up considerably under power when they are trimmed for a good glide. While it is true that the usual manner of adding excessive downthrust will relieve this effect, it will not produce best duration results.

The nose-up tendency is best corrected by making the model less stable. This is done by moving the center of gravity or balancing point to the rear, or by making the model balance at a point that is further to the rear with respect to the wing. Of course, this adjustment will destroy the glide trim and the model must again be trimmed in the glide for the new location of the center of gravity by changing the stabilizer incidence as previously described.

Continuing with the case of our rubber model which at present balances at a point halfway between the leading and trailing edges (at the. 50% chord point), the next step is to destabilize the model slightly and thus reduce the nose-up under power tendency. This is done by shifting the wing forward about one quarter of an inch. The model now balances at a point one quarter of an inch further to the rear. The glide is checked and a slight stall is noted, which is trimmed out by stabilizer setting change.

Another test under power is tried and it is seen that there is still a slight stall under power, but that it is not nearly so severe. Another shifting forward of the wing is made and, after trimming for glide, the model is seen to climb steadily and glide smoothly in.

Successive flights under increasingly larger number of winds are made and in each case a smooth flight is obtained. After two or three hundred hand winds have been tried the winder can be used until the maximum number of turns of which the rubber motor is capable have been used. The correct position of the wing on the fuselage is, then marked for future assembly. After this all trim adjustments should be made by changing the stabilizer incidence for glide and by offsetting the thrustline to the right or left for changing the amount of turn under power.

The important thing is to determine, as described, where the wing should be located on the fuselage and to hold this for future flying.

It might have happened in the case of the rubber model just described, that, upon being flown under power for the first time, the model would dive to the ground. This would indicate that the model was not stable enough, and the trouble should be corrected in a manner just opposite to that previously given. That is, the wing should be moved rearwards a little, the stabilizer incidence changed to trim the glide and another low power flight made. This process is repeated until smooth power flights and glides are obtained, the number of winds being increased with additional flights until maximum winds are put in.

It should be noted that adding weight to the tail to move the center of gravity to the rear has the same effect as moving the wing forward: both operations decrease the stability of the. airplane. And, by the same token, it is true that adding weight to the nose, which moves the center of gravity forward, has the same effect as moving the wing to the rear: both actions increase stability.

Further discussion of the subject will be found in a forthcoming issue.




About Airplanes & Rockets 

Kirt Blattenberger, Webmaster - Airplanes and RocketsKirt Blattenberger

Carpe Diem! (Seize the Day!)

Even during the busiest times of my life I have endeavored to maintain some form of model building activity. This site has been created to help me chronicle my journey through a lifelong involvement in model aviation, which all began in Mayo, MD ...

Copyright  1996 - 2026
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the Airplanes and Rockets website are hereby acknowledged.

Homepage Archives  |  Modeling News Archives


Kirt Blattenberger


Family Websites:

RF Cafe

Equine Kingdom

Model Aircraft Museum, AMA - Airplanes and Rockets

Plastic Scale Model Kits - Airplanes and Rockets

Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) - Airplanes and Rockets

Academy of Model Aeronautics

Tower Hobbies logo - Airplanes and Rockets

Tower Hobbies

Horizon Hobby logo - Airplanes and Rockets

Horizon Hobby

Sig Manufacturing - Airplanes and Rockets

Sig Mfg

Brodak Manufacturing - Airplanes and Rockets

Brodak Mfg