Even during the busiest times of my life I have endeavored to maintain some
form of model building activity. This site has been created to help me chronicle
my journey through a lifelong involvement in model aviation, which
all began in Mayo, MD
Airplanes And Rockets Copyright 1996 - 2026
All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images
and text used on the Airplanes and Rockets website are hereby acknowledged.
Enterprise-E Control Line Stunt Model Building &
My Enterprise-E finally had its maiden flight today, and all went very well. The electric
power system seems appropriately fitted and provides way more than enough thrust. There
is a lot of control surface throw available so the first flight was a bit shaky for the
first few times around the circle, but the craft settled down after I got accustomed
to it. Three flights were put in and I brought her home unscathed - that's success in
January 3, 2015 Update:
A website visitor wrote to ask for details on the outboard wingtip weight box and
trim tab (see new photo below, left). Also, I forgot to
mention that I always remove the pins from hinges during installation and replace them
with one full-length piece of music wire (see pic). Doing
so makes covering much easier whether using Monokote or dope, since hinges can be aligned
and glued before covering with wire in place. The wire is removed and surfaces separated
for covering and then re-installed after covering. It adds very little weight and has
the benefit of filling the hinge line gap for aerodynamic efficiency.
Outboard Wingtip Detail. Approximately 0.6 oz. of lead pellets fit
in the weight box. Standard control horn and pushrod used on trim tab.
this article to describe my experience building BJM Enterprises' Enterprise-E electric
control line stunt model. For now, photos are being posted mainly to get that part of
the job done ahead of time. The model is very well designed and all of the laser-cut
parts fit perfectly. Wood selection is very good for the most part. The only exception
is that my fingers easily punched through the 1/16" sheeting for the fuselage bottom
in front of the wing when handling it with the motor, battery, and ESC installed, so
I replaced it with hard 3/32" sheeting. The provided building instructions are at best
guidelines with no pictures or illustrations, and some parts of them referred to an old
version of the kit that had built-up tail surfaces (now solid). I posted lots of photos
of the building process below. This is definitely not a fledgling builder's kit, but
then the Enterprise-E is a high performance model targeted to the experienced builder/flyer.
Bill Mandakis, BJM's owner,
is very willing to answer questions and make recommendations.
Dave Nyce, of North Carolina, sent me these photos of his Enterprise-E
project. I really like how he integrated the top portion of the motor cowl into the fuselage
top hatch to facilitate servicing the motor if necessary. Unlike with a nitro engine
that typically mounts with bolts perpendicular to the thrust line so access from the
fuselage side is possible, with electric motors the mounting bolts are accessed from
the front. Enclosing the motor with a cowl as shown on the plans would make bolt access
difficult at best and impossible at worst. Dave used Monokote on the wings and paint
The recommended motor (KDA-A30-12M) does not fit in the location shown on the plans
and had to have its centerline shifted down about 1/4". The recommended battery (11.1V,
3,3000 mAH LiPo) was a very tight fit and required hollowing out the top hatch in order
to clear the outline while also providing a little clearance for airflow around the battery.
I see that a different power package is now recommended by BJM, so maybe those components
fit within the plan outlines. Also, while a rear motor shaft ball bearing was supplied,
there was no bulkhead for it in the kit or shown on the plans so I designed my own. Bill
says that new kits will include a redesigned fuselage front end that uses a laser-cut
plywood structure for mounting the motor and bearing.
Details of the pushrod setup were not provided. I attempted to build everything exactly
per the plans and instructions, but the supplied 1/8" music wire that was meant to connect
to the flap and elevator horns proved to be too difficult to use in the confined space
at the rear of the fuselage. In fact using the 1/8" music wire for the elevator horn
connection would have required cutting a slot through the fuselage side and fitting a
blister bump on the outside to contain the pushrod (not shown
on the plans). Instead, I used a more conventional connection with standard pushrod
material and an "L" bend with a nylon retainer clip on the elevator. I left the last
1½" of bottom sheeting off the very rear of the fuselage to permit easy access to the
linkage. A carbon rod was used between the metal wire at both ends of the pushrod. The
provided 1/8" music wire was used at the bellcrank end of the flap pushrod, but then
standard pushrod wire with a threaded metal clevis was soldered to it and used at the
flap control horn end.
A few pieces of balsa were missing from my kit, and BJM offered to provide them, but
it was minimal so I just used what I had on-hand. There were some hardware items that,
per the labels on the kit box, should have been included but were missing. Again, Bill
offered to provide them, but I had what I needed on-hand and provided them myself. The
retail value of the missing items probably would have totaled somewhere around $10, but
the main drawback is the inconvenience.
My forward hatch hold-down method uses a pair of 1/16" music wire pins passing through
metal tubing. It is fast and easy and weights almost nothing. A slight kink is bent into
the ends of the pins to make sure they stay in place when pushed all the way in. Super
magnets are nice, but they can be a pain, as can a threaded bolt (as shown on the plans).
Note: For even easier access, I later replaced the wire and tubing with a couple rare
Please note that methods and materials shown in my photos might be different from
those ordained by BJM Enterprises and/or RSM Distribution. I have developed my own preferences
over the years. Any questions should be directed to those two parties.
The weight prior to covering (only the frame, no landing gear,
motor, battery, or ESC) was 10.7 oz., and the final all-up, ready-to-fly
weight tips the scales at 34.1 oz. With an advertised wing area of 357 in2,
that works out to a wing loading of 0.0955 oz/in2 (13.8 oz/ft2.
The MotoCalc analysis warns that at full throttle for an extended period the will likely
overstress the motor (see full MotoCalc
report at bottom of page), but I did not have the exact specifications for the
motor, ESC, or battery for an exact analysis. RSM Distributors says the provided .25-size
brushless motor is very efficient and should have no problem with their in-house tested
*** Note: They replaced the original ESC with a Mantis 45A model to make sure it would
handle the power.
My Enterprise-E is now ready for its maiden flight. The center of gravity (C/G) is
slightly forward of where it is indicated on the plans. Hopefully, I'll be back soon
with news of a successful experience!
Enterprise-E (kitted and sold by BJM)
By Kirt Blattenberger
Completed Enterprise-E (top)
Completed Enterprise-E (side)
Ready for Covering: Top
Ready for Covering: Side
Elevator Control Horn Pushrod Connection
Flap & Elevator Pushrod Connections
Velcro Battery Restraint
Motor Rear Bearing Bulkhead Completed
Squaring the Firewall
Landing Gear Mount Epoxied w/Gussets
"Needed to Complete" Label
Sheer Webs for Wings
Clearance Notches in Ribs for Bellcrank Leadout
Leadout Wires Ready to Be Crimped
Bellcrank Leadout Wire After Crimping
Completed Enterprise-E (bottom)
Enterprise-E Motor, Battery, & Electronics
Wing Star Layout
Ready for Covering: Bottom
Hatch w/Latch Tubes
(these have been replaced w/magnets)
Turtledeck Sheeting Installation
Tailwheel Mount Being Epoxied
Clamping Tailwheel Mount
Motor Rear Bearing Bulkhead Prior to Bearing
The full-throttle steady-state motor temperature (359°F) is extremely high, which
will likely damage the motor unless full-throttle is used very sparingly (even then,
damage is possible). Current can be decreased by using fewer cells, a smaller diameter
or lower pitched propeller, a higher gear ratio, or some combination of these methods.
Power System Notes:
The full-throttle motor current at the best lift-to-drag ratio airspeed (43A) falls
approximately between the motor's maximum efficiency current (34.6A) and its current
at theoretical maximum output (222.8A), thus making effective use of the motor.
The static pitch speed (53mph) is within the range of approximately 2.5 to 3 times
the model's stall speed (17mph), which is considered ideal for good performance. With
a wing loading of 13.7oz/sq.ft., a model of this size will have trainer-like flying characteristics.
It would make an ideal trainer, for use in calm to light wind conditions. The static
thrust (55.2oz) to weight (33.9oz) ratio is 1.63:1, which will result in extremely short
take-off runs, no difficulty taking off from grass surfaces (assuming sufficiently large
wheels), and vertical climb-outs. This model will probably be able to perform a hover
or torque roll. At the best lift-to-drag ratio airspeed, the excess-thrust (37.8oz) to
weight (33.9oz) ratio is 1.11:1, which will give very steep climbs and incredible acceleration.
This model can easily do consecutive loops, and has sufficient in-flight thrust for any
This analysis is based on calculations that take motor heating effects into account.
These calculations are based on mathematical models that may not account for all limitations
of the components used. Always consult the power system component manufacturers to ensure
that no limits (current, rpm, etc.) are being exceeded.