Those
of us fortunate (or unfortunate, depending on your point of view)
to have been in the model airplane realm back in the 1960s and 1970s
(and earlier) are very familiar with
Maxey Hester and his award-winning models. Mr. Hester designed
many of the fine scale models sold (some still) by Sig Manufacturing
of Montezuma, Iowa. In fact, if you don't know, Maxey later married
Hazel Sigafoose after her first husband and company co-founder
(Glen) died (during an aerobatic performance). This P-63 Kingcobra
was designed for 'multi' radio and a K&B .45 engine. The wingspan
is about 64". Maxey's Marvelous P-63
Author Maxey Hester of Des Moines, Iowa, with his radio controlled
near-scale Bell P-63 Kingcobra "multi" job.
At
the 1960 Dallas Nationals, while waiting in the ready line at the
hotly contested (in more ways than one!) multi R/C event, I was
struck by the similarity of most entries. While there was a small
variety of configurations, the majority were pretty much the same
in shape, ranging from plain to downright ugly. At that moment the
concentration required in competitive flying didn't allow further
speculation, but after the meet on the long drive home, I got to
thinking about what to build for the following season. Seemed to
me that a good "pattern airplane" could be designed that would be
realistic in appearance without sacrificing stunting performance.
Since the trend at Dallas indicated trike gear was the only
way to get top points for take-off and landing, I began looking
up full scale designs so equipped. It didn't take very long to narrow
the field, because my preference was for a military aircraft and
there just weren't many in the pre-jet age that had tricycle gear.
Of the few I was able to turn up, only the Bell Airacobra P-39 seemed
a likely candidate. Later I was to discover that Harold deBolt and
others had arrived at the same conclusion. Shortly after
the Nats I was visiting fellow clubman Claude McCullough, having
taken on the test piloting of his Martin Mauler R/C job. He's a
scale fiend from way back with a large collection of magazines,
books and 3-views. We got to digging around for material on the
P-39 and turned up plans and photos of it as well as a later development,
the P-63 "Kingcobra." Its lines were more appealing and I was not
long deciding that here was the configuration I was seeking - the
ideal layout for a fully stuntable multi that could be near scale
in outline. I worked out specs that tied the lines of the
P-63 to well-proven multi construction practices; Claude (a big-time
Iowa farmer also known as "Mac," "Flint" and/or "Flyaway") drew
up the plans. Turned out during one winter month, the plane was
an instant hit with everyone who saw it. As soon as the weather
broke in the spring, out came the Kingcobra and proving the point
that airplanes which look right generally fly right, performed perfectly
on the first attempt, only minor trimming being required.
The model was an impressive stunter, fast yet extremely smooth.
But there was one large ant in the oatmeal. Wanting a fine finish
to go along with the sharp appearance, I applied what has come to
be known in these parts as a "McCullough" finish. This is measured
not in coats, but in gallons. It turned out plastic-smooth (note
photos) but I found out that you never get something for nothing
... the finished product weighed nearly 8 lbs., at least one more
than planned. This extra weight was carried fairly by the
model, nevertheless there were a couple of maneuvers where the "McCulloughnizing"
had its effect. Since contests are won or lost on such little matters
as half a point, I concluded that my lighter, modified Orion would
have to be my main multi competition ship; the Cobra would serve
as my scale entry. No scale contests were scheduled before
the 1961 Nationals but the P-63 made its mark as a demonstration
airplane, flying at noon-hour contest breaks all over the Midwest.
For an experiment, at the Lincoln, Neb., meet the Cobra performed
after the regular events be-fore the same set of judges as my 1st
place multi-winning Orion. The P-63 was only two points less than
the winning flight in spite of that weight disadvantage. There's
no doubt but that "K.C." consistently copped the prize for interest
throughout the season ... always it was the airplane everyone asked
to photograph and see fly. Cliff Bennett got good movie shots of
it in action at a big Chicago contest. He showed these during the
Nationals (I didn't get to see them). At the Nationals scale
event, it seemed the Cobra would really be in its element as a thoroughly
checked and proven model. But fate and Murphy's law (i.e. - If it
can happen, it will) ruled otherwise. Just after completing the
straight flight back from a procedure turn during the first round,
transmitter failure transformed the Cobra and my hopes into a heap
of pieces ... luckily, at least, off the concrete runway or there
would have been radio and servo shards among the balsa shreds. Up
to this catastrophe I had collected 25.5 flight points, which added
to my scale judging score of 67.66 gave a fairly respectable for
fourth place ... not too bad for a nearly Kaput airplane.
Another Murphy (Joe) with 60.33 scale points plus 53.2 points
for flying went home to California with the trophy. His mantle might
have been bit less loaded if our Cobra had been in the air a couple
of minutes longer before the transmitter antenna lead let go!
After
a busy contest schedule (over 10,000 miles of driving, some flying)
when the weather turned "sour" I got to looking at the pieces. England's
Henry J. Nicholls and Claude had helped me gather up most of them,
though we missed a few of the smaller ones embedded in the landing
crater. World Engines' John Maloney later found the nose hatch cover.
Actually for such a spectacular plunge the remains were in fairly
good shape - most vertical full power bashes don't leave much repairable.
So I began hooking it back together. In recovering the whole ship
and using a minimum rather than a maximum amount of dope, I dropped
a full pound of weight - this in spite of the fact that jigsaw puzzle
repair jobs invariably make the structure weigh more than it did
originally. It looks nearly as good as it did at first and flies
even better at the lower loading. I took it down to the last contest
of our Midwest season in Topeka on Nov. 11-12 and finished on a
high note - first place in the scale event.

Maxey Hester's P-63 Kingcobra Fuselage Plans

Maxey Hester's P-63 Kingcobra Wing Rib Plans

Maxey Hester's P-63 Kingcobra Wing Rib Templates The construction, along proven lines, should not require much
explanation to a builder with R/C experience. And certainly you
should have some experience, preferably with low-wing, aileron-controlled
planes before tackling a project like this P-63. Take time
selecting your wood before beginning. About the only place for hard
balsa is in the elevator and wing spars. Longerons and stringers
are medium. Use harder balsa for ribs near the center, graduate
to light balsa at the tips. Planking and fin and rudder are Sig
Contest (very light) balsa; all blocks are soft. The fuselage
is a combination of square longeron built up and sheet side construction.
Assemble 1/4" side frames and install formers before covering sides
with 3/32" sheet-doubled in areas indicated. One of the
most talked-about scale - like R/C planes in the 1961 contest circuit,
Maxey's beautiful low-winger appeared headed for a national championship
last summer when it crashed as the result of a broken antenna lead.
For data on postwar-II clipped-wing scale P-63 see pages 20-21,
January 1959 American Modeler. Take particular care around
the mounts and nose blocks to get everything solidly fastened. I
used Ambroid on the entire job, pre-gluing all joints for greater
strength. Leave nose squared off until construction is completed
then carve to shape with spinner and motor installed (but not running).
Note fuselage has slight curvature between F-1 and F-2.
Reproduce this by allowing stringers to protrude slightly, sanding
them to conform to this contour. The nose wheel gear designed
by Dale Nutter, used because of its scale appearance, works effectively.
(Available from Perfection Model Co., 827 22nd St., Santa Monica,
California, $7.50, ready-made, chrome plated.) I had homemade wheel
hubs and drums but Space Control brakes and wheels, now available,
are quite similar. The control rod for the L.G. is not shown
on the plan since its positioning is dependent on type and placement
of your R/C equipment and batteries. Some over-and-under bends are
required to clear things. Near the gear bend a "V" into the wire
to allow adjustments (by spreading or narrowing); this serves as
a shock device to take some of the landing strain off of the servo,
Very little wheel movement is required for making taxi turns - most
fliers use too much ending up with overly-sensitive response.
While the usual keepers are used to attach the control rods
to the servos, the motor control rod has none so the servo board
may be removed from the airplane. It is so close to the guide that
the wire stiffness holds it in place without a keeper. A vision
hole is cut in the fuselage planking just above the servo horn hole
so that you can see to guide the wire back into position when replacing
the servo board. Use flat head screws to mount the motor control
servo so that they will not hit the bottoms of the 3 other servos
on the other side. I use dowels for elevator and rudder
control rods considering them more trustworthy than balsa. A Bonner
nylon control horn is on the rudder. It is a good idea to make a
removable hatch on the bottom of the fuselage just below the elevator
horn so that changes in movement may be made easily. The
elevator trim deal, a very workable setup suggested to me by Ed
Kazmirski, couldn't be much simpler. I've used it on all of my airplanes.
To change the degree of trim just insert a larger or smaller spacer
as required. To be noted particularly - the nylon block should be
solid and non-flexible. I made mine from 1/4" thick nylon 3/8" sq.
The spring is not necessary once amount of trim is established,
since the block could then be solidly fastened, but it makes it
handy to move the unit to another airplane and have it always ready
for adjustment. The canopy is the deBolt CF-2 World War
II job which must be cut down, mainly from the front, to get the
shape peculiar to the Cobra. The framing is outlined with Scotch
Plastic Tape; This is not the familiar electric tape; very resistant
to being soaked loose by oil it must be applied to a clean surface
and can even be doped over for a better seal. (It is not advisable
to dope the entire canopy, it may. distort or warp.) The tape is
obtainable from hardware stores from a rack of colors and widths.
The wing and stab of conventional construction should give
no difficulty. Care should be taken to get the wing assembled perfectly
true ... these fast flying ships aren't happy with sloppy alignment.
I have a construction jig and the number of wings which have gone
through it make the extra effort well worth while. Similarly, double
check the angles of incidence of the wing and stab. A flat section
of fuselage is provided as a stab mount; wing angle may be measured
from the 1/4" sq. main longeron. The scale finish of the
Cobra was matt (non-glossy), but this does not mean crude. I can't
emphasize too strongly that your final finish depends mainly on
its base. Fill all those little cracks and nicks that collect during
construction with Plastic Balsa and fillet where necessary - as
on the scoop and fin - with the same material. Then caress everything
velvet smooth with fine sandpaper; it will take time and patience,
plus a lot of elbow grease. Next, give the entire framework
a coat of Sig Balsa Filler. Sand most of this off, so that the remaining
filler is mainly in the pores of the wood. Cover entire airplane
with silk, applied wet, sticking it on with dope on all balsa parts.
After drying, dope all of the exposed silk parts with one coat of
clear butyrate, follow with two more coats on the complete model.
Sand lightly with 400 wet-or-dry paper. Brush on one coat of Aero
Gloss Filler Coat over the entire model. Sand thoroughly. Spray
on two coats of thin color dope, Olive Drab on top, Light Gray on
the bottom. One coat of clear is then brushed on (to avoid overspray
traces) with a large fine-haired brush, on top of the color. After
several days drying, sand with 400. Try not to sand through the
clear into the color. Then one more coat of brushed clear. Rub with
very fine rubbing compound (I used the white variety) to dull the
glitter of the last coat of clear. Final step is waxing with Aero
Gloss wax. This is not quite as striking as my original gallon-and-a-half
job, but it is fully presentable and doesn't add surplus weight.
Originally the Air Force insignia was hand-painted. On the
refinishing job, decals from the Sterling Mustang kit were found
to be just right. After attaching the decals and removing all bubbles,
I applied a thin coat of decal setting liquid to stick them down.
For scale accuracy, the red stripe should be removed by covering
the bar with a piece of white decal material cut to the same shape.
Tail numbers were cut from Sig decal material, I used my AMA number.
Since the Kingcobra wasn't used in combat by the U.S. you
can't find any authentic fancy paint jobs. All of the photos we
have found show it in stock olive drab top, light gray bottom, black
wing walks with white or yellow tail numbers or unpainted bare metal
with black tail numbers. Many P-63's were supplied to the Russians
with a red star in a white circle, same size as the U.S. star and
circle (including border) but with no border or bar and on both
wings, top and bottom. A number were used as piloted target planes
(now there was an assignment!), some painted orange-yellow overall,
with a bull's-eye on the cockpit sides and such names as "Pin-Ball
Special" on the nose. So if you want to be different, look up these
off-beat color schemes. You'll be better off not trying
to cut corners on the equipment installation - the higher quality
items are the cheapest in the long run. I used Bonner Transmite
Servos and have flown the Cobra with C. G., Klinetronics and Min-X
outfits. A word on flying: First of all, it goes without
saying (but I'll say it anyway) that the first flights are not even
attempted until everything - alignment, C.G. position, operation
of the motor and all radio gear - is 100%. Then, if you are not
a fully qualified multi low-wing flier with a log book showing hours
of flying time, "forego the thrill (?) of first flight and get an
experienced R/C'er to do the test flying. Until completely checked
out, there is no substitute for a skilled hand on the box. Once
over the hurdle of initial flights, have your test pilot "take off
the ship and get up to altitude before giving you the box to get
the feel of the plane and standing by to take over should you develop
a nervous twitch-a normal reaction that even top fliers develop
on occasion. I've test flown a couple of dozen airplanes
this past season, some of them really wild, and only automatic reactions
built up by hundreds of flights saved many of them from piling in
on the first time up. I recently worked up a linked transmitters
affair that allows the test pilot to take over control of the airplane
at a drop of the switch, to better handle a testing or training
assignment. Having a club test pilot is getting to be a common practice
in many sections and a sensible one considering the amount of work
and money tied up in a multi R/C. Adjust so even full-down
trim will hold the plane level while in inverted flight. Up-trim
should be set for the best normal glide for landing. The P-63 should
have a rather fast glide, nose slightly down. If you try to slow
the glide down too much, there won't be good control reaction and
she will stall out too easily and settle too soon. It's better to
come in fast, clean and steady than galloping around. Every
airplane has its own individual characteristics which must be learned,
but the Kingcobra is fairly free of idiosyncrasies. I do advise
ailerons-only and not using up-elevator during spiral dives, for
she twists quite spectacularly what with the large fin area. It
is best not to chance stalling out the ailerons delaying recovery.
The interest shown by both spectator and modelers in the
P-63 has amply verified my thought that a realistic appearing model
was the ticket. It is a topnotch pattern performer. With enthusiasm
for R/C scale increasing she should make a good building project.
Notice:
The AMA Plans Service offers a
full-size version of many of the plans show here at a very reasonable cost. They
will scale the plans any size for you. It is always best to buy printed plans because
my scanner versions often have distortions that can cause parts to fit poorly. Purchasing
plans also help to support the operation of the
Academy of Model Aeronautics - the #1
advocate for model aviation throughout the world. If the AMA no longer has this
plan on file, I will be glad to send you my higher resolution version.
Try my Scale Calculator for
Model Airplane Plans.
Posted August 19, 2013
|